I can’t believe it’s not the Justice League

Three thoughts about the Avengers movie:

One punch. Again

Joss Whedon’s debt to the 1980s Keith Giffen and JM DeMatteis approach, for the kind of writing that has since become linked to him by name, has never been more clear.

The whole all-you-can-eat green-screen approach, whereby any time the camera pans round behind someone to show what they’re looking at they’re clearly looking at the insides of a warehouse in a far-off and cheaper state, must truly be a dead loss if a DP as great as Seamus McGarvey can’t figure out a way to make it breathe.

Needless to say, if Janet van Dyne eventually turns up in this flavour of the Marvel Universe and carries on like this, I am going to have some kind of coronary incident.


For the birds

xkcd knows the scoreI reviewed The Raven for Critic’s Notebook. I did this mostly because I remember coming out of The Sure Thing in 1985 convinced that John Cusack was a superhuman actor equipped for any film genre dreamed up by man, and wanted to see if the theory still held water. Which it does, if you charitably call the current model of 15-year-old-friendly un-horrific horror films a genre.

The film makers never actually bring up the name of Alan Moore, but they hardly need to. The man’s shadow will loom automatically over a film in which a historical literary figure adopts contemporary mannerisms and lands himself in a tale so self-reflexive that it feels like its own graphic novel. The fact that The Raven also manages to look a lot like a cross between From Hell and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, filmed in the well-known Baltimore suburbs of Belgrade and Budapest on sets lighted by the output of one small firefly, and by the man who made V for Vendetta to boot, just makes the wizard of Northampton’s presence more palpable.

Any resemblance to Edgar Allan Poe is coincidence, but Mr Cusack can still get the acting job well and truly done. The review is here over at Critic’s Notebook, and yes, once I realized that “Nevermore” rhymes with “Alan Moore,” one thing led to another.

Meanwhile…

Four thousand miles east and forty-five years later, Georges Duroy rides again in the new version of Bel Ami. This time the general air of Now is more considered, since these are actors with distinctly modern ways of going about their business, and the plot’s interests in desert wars and press corruption are kept on the boil between all the un-corseting and de-girdling.

It also shows three composed and seemingly self-possessed woman drawn helplessly into bed with a floppy-haired youth at very little urging, leaving the story open to its most misogynist reading. Robert Pattinson gamely submitting to a fine bout of joyless sex isn’t really enough to balance the books, and I can think of several folk who might hate it, for reasons both warranted and not.

Whether Bel Ami’s tweaks and mannerisms energize the historical-drama trade or leave it looking a bit rootless is a murky question, but all the right texts have been studied. A film that remembers how Uma Thurman is naturally built for period drama is setting off on the right lines, and this one goes on to hire Anthony Higgins and Christopher Fulford for cameos of several seconds each. If only it could have wheeled the three of them into the same drawing room for a shouting match. That review is here, at the same venue .


Camera unobscura

A while ago I asked a market analyst if he could identify the magic ingredient that changed camera phones from a niche technology into ubiquitous consumables, assuming he’d say it happened when engineers worked out how to get enough megapixels into the things to make the photographs actually worth looking at.

His answer was Facebook. That and consumer willingness to embrace data plans that let people successfully send pictures without going bankrupt or expiring from boredom while they were about it.

This fact came up while researching an article on camera phone optics for The Optical Society. Another nugget was that one of the foremost developers of a particular technology that seemed tailor-made to suit the camera phone sector, a company I’ve been writing about in one way or another for years, had withdrawn from the fray while I wasn’t looking, brought low by a licensing strategy that looked like exactly the right idea on paper.

Point being: becoming ubiquitous is a bruising business. But it certainly pushes technology forwards.

My feature about some of the optics technology built into camera phones is the cover story of the February issue of the OSA’s Optics and Photonics News, and is also currently an open-access article on their web site.


Mondo apocalypto

The annual year-end bun grapple over at Critic’s Notebook brings the inevitable list: Ten films I liked from 2011.

At this rate next December’s apocalypse will be caused entirely by the posting online of more Top Ten Films of 2012 lists than the cosmos can allow.

Updated to add:

I didn’t realise that Julia Leigh’s Sleeping Beauty – that’s Emily Browning above, in the process of applying for the job – never got a review at Critic’s Notebook when it was released in the UK or subsequently when it broke cover in the US. It’s also one of those films that seems to have left the New Model Collective of film reviewers in a bit of a muddle. So for the record, set the Wayback Machine for Things I Wrote Down Last October (now with fewer typos):

Julia Leigh Sleeps Furiously: Sleeping Beauty

None of the many calamitous ways in which the sight of old men queueing up to fondle a comatose Emily Browning could have gone off the rails actually happen in Sleeping Beauty, since it turns out that Julia Leigh is a) a clinician with a painter’s eye for compositions and tones, and b) not mucking about. She’s also not exactly breaking new ground, pulling on threads already tackled in one form or another by Kubrick and Bunuel, and indeed by Jane Campion, whose name on the label seems to have confused those forgetting that Campion’s waded out into frustrated sexuality and the human textures of homesteads before. But not quite like this. To say Leigh scores a bullseye on some complex ambiguities of masculine power and feminine voids is an understatement. Sleeping Beauty is taut as a stretched rubber band, set squarely in the art house wheelhouse with acres of still compositions and sound design to let the mind roam around, but with the tonal refresher of the whole Australian setting and screen acting style kicking in all the time. It’s also roughly as erotic as eye surgery, and anyone detecting actual misogyny or anti-feminism in its sights and sounds deserves a close encounter with the mighty pillow of truth, especially if they’re male. In fact your reaction may hinge entirely upon exactly which side of life’s median line you happen to find yourself.

Leigh doesn’t bother to hide the cogs, so Sleeping Beauty is transparent. Browning is orally penetrated for money in the name of science in scene one and doesn’t get much joy from it, so her half of the agenda is in plain sight from the off. The meatier side comes later via the three old men who queue up for a grope, three fearless old actors whose conflicted and conflicting horrors are only slightly weakened by noticing that one of them was in Mad Max when the world was younger. Some reviewers have detected pretension everywhere, but the film’s only actual tinge of the stuff comes via a long literary monologue delivered straight to camera by Old Man One (the interweb tells me it’s a story by Ingeborg Bachmann), shortly before he bares a bod that looks in need of a thrash with a carpet beater and is revealed to be hung like a dormouse. Not sure that bravery is quite the word for that.

All the rigid lines and staged country-house formality of it keep the focus squarely where Leigh intends it to be: on the minds rather than the bodies. Rachel Blake’s madam is carved from some kind of marble, and if her deportment wasn’t all you needed to know about her then the way her pinky finger locks at precisely thirty degrees while pouring the tea fills in the gaps. Leigh uses fades rather than cuts, the classic metaphor for decay and unconsciousness, and builds them into an Aussie setting with all its body consciousness and free-wheeling machismo intact – states of mind which are then unpicked by Leigh with a laser microscope, in a manor-house lit by southern hemisphere sunlight. Emily Browning’s naked body is on screen so often you almost ignore it, but the varying views and vistas out of the windows she parades in front of at different points in the plot are at least as significant. Look at the framing of her alabaster body among the other olive-skined brunettes and tell me this director isn’t in complete control of mood, tone and perspective.

Browning’s bravery in doing this thing is beyond question, and at least her style looks a better fit with the actual story here than it was in Sucker Punch. But the dilemma that always hangs around screen portrayals of shallow characters applies: casting someone who’s not a born firebrand might suit the story, but dents the film. Browning is obliged to downplay so far she’s practically planted in the ground, swinging between being a hollowed-out void to strangers and a conflicted bitch to people she knows. She comes across as an emptier vessel than the investigation underway can really use. Faced with a cameoing Amazonian brunette I’d not seen before named Mirrah Foulkes, whose six-foot black-clad face-decorated usually-topless frame glides around as if following lines of magnetism while she radiates the kind of air that could lead a man to his doom, Browning seems lost for words. She wasn’t the only one.


Live from the Acme Retirement Castle

Chloe Sevigny in All Flowers In Time

The challenge in covering Bristol’s Encounters Film Festival, once you’ve calculated a route to Canon’s Road that doesn’t actually involve Canon’s Road on a Saturday night, is to accept the inevitable: A festival report that attempts to describe everything screened at a short-film festival would have to rumble on for a week. Even one limited to just the films you actually like will have a commissioning editor reaching for the migraine pills.

Little White Lies gave me space to rave about a few, but leaving out the ones that wouldn’t fit was a chore. No room to mention Tony Grisoni’s The Pizza Miracle, with its fake slice of black and white Italiano called The Madonna of the Eels and the looming silent presence of none other than Ray Cooper. No space to giggle at The External World, David O’Reilly’s spasm of animated lunacy on which a year’s worth of catchphrases can draw. Darren Kent playing a lad allergic to sunlight in Sunny Boy and blurring the lines between acting and reality completely; the young actress in Burn My Body who did the same thing from the exact opposite direction; Luke Treadaway looking very harassed in Man In Fear (“I’m being hunted by a conceptual artist.”/”Is he threatening to drop a pickled shark on you sir?”)… All gone, washed away by the editing tide.

The Little White Lies festival report about the ones that survived the edit, including the film in which Chloë Sevigny does something remarkable with her face, is posted here.

An Encounters interview with animator John Kricfalusi circled the runway for a while but has now landed over at Critic’s Notebook.

Just for comparison’s sake an earlier Encounters report from a few years back is online at the same place, this being the one in which my admiration for Rebecca Hall really kicked in.

 


One of our spy’s wives is missing

George Smiley’s school days. And Connie Sachs’ too for that matter.

Trace almost anything interesting in new films back a bit and Alex Cox will pop up at some point. Come on film gods: The man links Ed Harris and Miguel Sandoval with Edward Tudor-Pole and Michelle Winstanley. Let him loose more often.

My main memory of watching Gary Oldman in Sid and Nancy is of wanting to keep perfectly still in case he saw me and took my head off. Seeing him disappear behind the complicated defenses of George Smiley all these years later is like watching a nuclear reactor boil a kettle, but no less engaging for that. Shame that the new version of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy decides not to tackle one of the characters that made Smiley’s defenses complicated in the first place.

Some thoughts on Tinker Tailor and the absence of Ann Smiley are posted online over at Critic’s Notebook.


He said, she said

Céline Sciamma’s effortlessly touching film Tomboy gets its message across in so many subtle ways that the one moment of deliberate directorial flourish leaves you suddenly adrift. Having made a point of regarding Laure, the ten-year-old girl in the process of passing herself off as a ten-year-old boy, with a minimum of nervous excitement and plenty of Gallic égalité, the camera suddenly deserts her. In her moment of keenest need it swings away into the trees for a bit, where the natural world rolls on. Eventually it wanders back to find that Laure has rolled on too. Poetry for the eyes.

My interview with Céline Sciamma about the film and her obvious encounter with the gods of casting is online here at Little White Lies.


The bad old days of cavorting and revelry

Danu the ethereal handful

2000 AD and I were through by 1989, so I missed the moment when Pat Mills and Simon Bisley began Slaine: The Horned God and jointly shifted the orbit of the whole publication. Painted comics have travelled a rocky road since then, but The Horned God has never gone away.

The latest round of the story’s immortality is a US hardcover edition, which prompted my retrospective review and interview with the writer and the artist in the latest digital edition of Tripwire Magazine. Free pdf download at the link.


Carlos Reygadas and the sound of silence

Written for The Film Talk:

Anapola Mushkadiz in Battle In Heaven, Carlos Reygadas

The Film Talk’s magnificent JumboChat5000 operating system, which also coughs up my lottery numbers, recently flagged up a months-old post by my comrade Tony Youngblood about cinema anima.

I’m curious about that label, but since I haven’t seen all the films Tony describes I’m happy to take his word that it fits. And in any case, this topic is the argument that never stops: One of its many sub-squabbles broke out again last week in the New York Times Magazine over Solaris, and I await Tony’s views on that with interest.

But arguments are inevitable, since films like Carlos Reygadas’ Battle In Heaven and Silent Light, two films that Tony mentions, are confrontational experiences. Being contemplative and ineffable doesn’t rule out being intensely manipulative at the same time, and Reygadas is nothing if not a provocateur.

Battle In Heaven sets up its audience manipulation right from the off. You will have heard that the film starts with an uncensored slow-motion blowjob, but it’s one in which the camera, advancing at snail’s pace, ends up sliding in between fellatrix and fellatee. This involves a noticeable shift of balance by performer Anapola Mushkadiz, who opens her eyes to find the audience regarding her from a range of about one inch and cries two teardrops the color of her mascara. Well yes, hello there. Reygadas is well aware that contemplation and voyeurism operate on similar principles.

Whenever Battle In Heaven sets up a long static shot, the results are far from calming. Instead it seems as if holy terror is rolling in on a storm front. Which indeed it is, at least in the heart of the guilt-ridden and tormented Marcos (Marcos Hernandez), a man blown so entirely off-course by the state of his conscience that he ends up undergoing an ascension of his own in the Basilica Of Our Lady Of Guadalupe. Reygadas marks this with a sequence in which church bells undergo their protracted start-up procedures and then ring silently, impotently, in torrential rain, one of the most jarring images of alienation from the divine you could wish to see.

Silent Light launches itself even further off the ledge, surveying not just the hearts of men but the work of God as well. Reygadas cuts the audience adrift, presenting it with small aesthetic cubes of still-life in an environment so loaded with unfamiliarity and distance from the man-made that it might as well be a fictional dimension. The film provides acres of challenging space for the viewer’s mind to experiment on, to reason with, to suppose and decide – always supposing you don’t decide to go for coffee instead.

There is another art form that can do this by design: poetry. Silent Light may well be the closest thing to a stanza of written poetry that a moving image could possibly conjure up. Unfortunately, Reygadas then said this while promoting the film:

I hate the idea that film is actually telling a story! The great part of film is to make you feel, not by the narrative. For example, the first shot of my film is cinematic. The light itself is beautiful. In literature, that does not exist.

Which is problematic on so many levels that I ended up giving Silent Light shorter shrift in print than it deserves. If he means that films act not just on your brain but on other organs lower down, then most certainly yes. But if he believes that you don’t get beautiful light in literature then I think he’s barking up the wrong tree, and has obliquely disproved his own argument.

While we’re about it, let me throw in a candidate for cinema anima whose films approach from a totally different direction. Brillante Mendoza employs non-professional actors, long takes, yawning silences, natural rhythms and moral dilemmas, but veers so far from static contemplation that the rain, sewage and tears of his native Manila get into your pores. Energized by the life force of roughly twenty million souls, his films are mood-heavy enough to break your heart, while also charged with enough anima to get it going again.


Dream country

Carlos poster

Cross-posted from the annual Critic’s Notebook end-of-year film critics bun gapple: a Top Ten from the mainstream, which was where the action wasn’t.

My favorite film of the year is on this list. My second and third favorites were too experimental to attract any wide distribution, but that’s life. Mainstream distributors prefer event movies, and event movies are more to do with drug delivery and a repeat of whatever pleasant sensations seemed to work last time rather than anything more sophisticated, but that’s life as well. The porn industry has done alright for itself with that business model for 10,000 years, and with about as much need for critics too. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.